By the Libertarian Party of California • Updated August 28, 2025
End the Fed explained in simple terms: when libertarians say “End the Fed,” it can sound extreme. But it’s really about who controls our money, how the Federal Reserve affects prices and savings, and whether we should allow competition in money to protect everyday people.
The Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) is America’s central bank, created in 1913 to manage the money supply and stabilize banks. Unlike your local credit union, the Fed isn’t elected—yet it has enormous power over interest rates, credit, and the value of your savings.
The Fed can also create new money—usually electronically—by buying government debt and other assets. Since the dollar isn’t backed by gold or silver, it’s fiat money: valuable because the government declares it legal tender and people accept it in trade.
Ever notice how $100 doesn’t buy what it used to? That’s inflation—your money quietly losing value over time. When new dollars are created, more dollars chase the same goods, pushing prices up. It’s like a hidden tax on your savings and paycheck.
In theory, the Fed is a neutral referee. In practice, it often bails out large financial institutions when they make bad bets—while regular people absorb losses through unemployment, foreclosures, or weaker pensions. That’s not neutrality; that’s cronyism.
We accept competition everywhere—phones, sodas, cars. With money, there’s effectively one option: dollars managed by the Fed. Libertarians ask: why not allow competition? If people could choose among dollars, gold, crypto, or state currencies, the best money would earn trust by holding its value. That’s the heart of End the Fed explained in practice.
The phrase gained steam with Congressman Ron Paul’s 2009 bestseller End the Fed, which argued the Fed is unconstitutional, fuels inflation and boom-bust cycles, enables endless wars by quietly financing debt, and serves insiders over the public. The book struck a chord during and after the 2008 crisis when Wall Street bailouts contrasted with Main Street pain.
Mainstream economists defend central banking and fiat currency for flexibility in crises and international stability. They’re skeptical of returning to a gold standard or abolishing the Fed. Even so, many acknowledge that policy mistakes can worsen inequality and moral hazard—encouraging risk-taking by institutions that expect rescue.
The goal isn’t chaos—it’s choice and transparency. Here are viable directions supporters discuss:
Different models can coexist—the market sorts out what’s trustworthy. That’s End the Fed explained as a policy path: end monopoly, invite competition.
Yes. Ending the Fed doesn’t end the dollar overnight. Payroll and payments continue, while alternatives can compete over time.
They would still be paid in dollars. Competition may gradually push toward monies that hold value better, but benefits still arrive.
Libertarians argue many major crises happened with a central bank in place. A freer system could reduce boom-bust swings caused by policy shocks.
No. It’s for anyone tired of silent inflation, insider bailouts, and unaccountable monetary power.
Have feedback or a story to share? Contact us at pat@pan.sdcoxmail.com.