Barry Goldwater, the Civil Rights Act, and the Libertarian Dilemma

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 turned 61 years old on July 2, 2025.

Karl Hess speaking into a microphone; libertarian writer and Barry Goldwater’s speechwriter.
Karl Hess, Goldwater’s speechwriter, helped frame the arguments.

The Landmark Act

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed segregation and banned discrimination in employment. It dismantled Jim Crow laws and stands as one of the most important pieces of legislation in American history.

Goldwater’s Objection

Barry Goldwater, then a U.S. Senator and Republican presidential nominee, voted against the Act. This surprised many, since he had integrated the Arizona Air National Guard, supported earlier civil rights bills, and personally opposed segregation.

His reasoning focused narrowly on principle. Goldwater believed Titles II and VII—which outlawed discrimination in private businesses and employment—granted Washington sweeping new power over private association and property rights.

“You cannot legislate morality.” — Barry Goldwater

To him, liberty meant that even unjust private decisions could not justify government coercion. Karl Hess, his speechwriter, sharpened the constitutional logic: freedom of association includes the freedom to choose wrongly.

The Libertarian Conflict

Here lies the dilemma for libertarians. On principle, Goldwater was correct. Limited government means resisting the temptation to solve every problem with federal power.

Yet Jim Crow was not simply “private prejudice.” It was a system of state-enforced coercion—segregation mandated by law, backed by police and courts. Ignoring this fact made Goldwater’s stance appear blind to the real source of oppression.

Was He Right?

From a libertarian lens, Goldwater’s vote was both principled and tragic. It upheld the philosophy of limited government, but it failed to meet the moral challenge of the age. In protecting constitutional limits, he left himself aligned with those maintaining injustice.

History has judged his vote harshly. And libertarians continue to wrestle with the lesson: can liberty survive if it does not also secure justice?

The Lasting Lesson

Goldwater’s opposition reminds us that liberty and justice sometimes pull in different directions. Libertarians must consistently oppose both state-imposed segregation and federal overreach. The challenge is applying principle with enough clarity to confront real-world injustice without handing the state limitless authority.


Join the Libertarian Party of California

We continue the work of advancing liberty with honesty and courage. If you believe in limited government, individual rights, and consistent freedom, we invite you to stand with us.

Become a Member Today